Content deleted Content added
→Hogwarts Express: :::{{U|Dom497}}, was this useful? —~~~~ <small>It can often be quite time-consuming to research, locate diffs and respond.</small> |
→Hogwarts Express FAC: {{U|Dom497}}, been holding back on this because a lot of relevant diffs turn out to relate to one particular editor. proposal to make additional edits likely to further impact long-term WP:INTEGRITY of the article, |
||
Line 47:
::Hey are you still working this out?--[[User:Dom497|<span style="color:#1F75FE">'''Dom497'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dom497|<span style="color:#00308F">'''talk'''</span>]]) 23:40, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
::: I know I'm kinda spamming you, but whats the status on this? In the interest of the FAC review I agree with the review that mentioned the quotes are not necessary in the references. I'll be removing them if you can't justify why you included them.--[[User:Dom497|<span style="color:#1F75FE">'''Dom497'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Dom497|<span style="color:#00308F">'''talk'''</span>]]) 13:36, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
:::: {{U|Dom497}}, been holding back on this because a lot of relevant diffs turn out to relate to one particular editor. That leaves a choice between (a) choosing to reply as-is, (b) write ''something else,'' or (c) leaving it on silent pause to avoid conflict. Hearing a proposal to make additional edits likely to further impact long-term [[WP:INTEGRITY]] of the article, …is frustrating. What would be the ''benefit'' to our ''readers''? —[[User:Sladen|Sladen]] ([[User talk:Sladen#top|talk]]) 14:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
== redoing indents ==
| |||